[126072] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SMW4 Routing Implications

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (virendra rode)
Thu Apr 29 15:46:51 2010

Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:45:31 -0700
From: virendra rode <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
To: shake righa <ssrigha@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2k73439e5a1004282023xae58f41evf2ca5b438fb4c2e7@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: virendra.rode@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,


shake righa wrote:
> What have been the routing implications in regards to internet traffic
> with SMW4
> cable beign down?
- -----------------------------------
Latency and slowness then again things are starting to change (mid-2010)
in terms of traffic balance as fibers are being lit across diverse paths.


regards,
/virendra

> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Shake Righa
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFL2eHbpbZvCIJx1bcRAjLfAKDl8ouIT9zH2pzjs/1uIafx8E281gCgvRXn
NdDyrX58kLpasNXDEcVgMCo=
=/YYx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post