[125972] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Andrews)
Tue Apr 27 19:39:10 2010
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:25:18 -0400."
<Pine.LNX.4.61.1004271718210.5148@soloth.lewis.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:38:06 +1000
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
In message <Pine.LNX.4.61.1004271718210.5148@soloth.lewis.org>, Jon Lewis writes:
> Both my kids run Win2k (to support old software that doesn't run
> well/at all post-2k). I doubt that's all that unusual.
Then they won't have IPv6 and hence are irrelevent to the discussion
about IPv6 NAT.
As for built in firewalls, even my brother printer as a firewall
built into it and it supports IPv6.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
