[125947] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: the alleged evils of NAT, was Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Tue Apr 27 14:04:39 2010
X-Envelope-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:02:00 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4BD72386.6010303@matthew.at>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 27/04/2010 18:48, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> Anyone inventing a new service/protocol that doesn't work with NAT isn't
> planning on success.
You mean, like multisession bgp over tls?
Nick,
just sayin'
