[125913] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Apr 26 11:08:33 2010
In-Reply-To: <4BD5A473.9050309@sprunk.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:07:52 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
Cc: North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> wrote=
:
> Don't forget the hotspot vendor that returns an address of 0.0.0.1 for
> every A query if you have previously done an AAAA query for the same
> name (and timed out). =A0That's a fun one.
so... aside from the every 3 months bitching on this list (and some on
v6ops maybe) about these sorts of things, what's happening to
tell/educate/warn/notice the hotspot-vendors that this sort of
practice (along with 'everything is at 1.1.1.1!') is just a bad plan?
How can users, even more advanced users, tell a hotspot vendor in a
meaningful way that their 'solution' is broken?
-chris
