[125824] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Apr 23 13:10:22 2010
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:45:05 +1000."
<201004231645.o3NGj5e5066388@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:30 -0400
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1272042510_4047P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 02:45:05 +1000, Mark Andrews said:
> Given I've been running dual stack nameservers for the last 7 years
> and never noticed any real problems I expect his problems are actually
> closer to home.
No, the problems are probably further back in time. We first started turning up
IPv6 back in 1997 or so. There's a *very* good chance that we turned it off a
decade ago (or whenever people *first* started listing quad-A's in NS entries)
due to breakage and never actually revisited it since then. This would have
been in the era of early 6bone and "your IPv6 connection is probably tromboned
through Tokyo".
--==_Exmh_1272042510_4047P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFL0dQOcC3lWbTT17ARAu1+AJkBqDfgCzKFT1f+Qtd4rmaGCKFhnwCgzEml
D9uF2g8xBqgNm7xiGMR6ecM=
=XmEF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1272042510_4047P--
