[125752] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Thu Apr 22 11:25:57 2010
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@americafree.tv>
To: "John Lightfoot" <jlightfoot@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <006901cae22d$2b1ce4c0$8156ae40$@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:25:24 -0400
Cc: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:04 AM, John Lightfoot wrote:
> That's Hedley.
>
I believe that he is talking about Hedy Lamarr, the co-inventor of
frequency hopping spread spectrum.
Regards
Marshall
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com [mailto:bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
> ]
> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:34 AM
> To: Simon Perreault
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
>>> On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC
>>> picks
>>> up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
>>> connection for anonymity purposes.
>>
>> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
>> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
>
> not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
> patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.
>
> --bill
>
>
>
>
