[125746] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Thu Apr 22 10:34:47 2010
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:34:03 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <4BD0424C.8090000@viagenie.ca>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:34:20AM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
> >On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
> >up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
> >connection for anonymity purposes.
>
> That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
> systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
not RFC4941... think abt applying Heddy Lamars
patents on spread-spectrum to source address selection.
--bill
