[125741] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Perreault)
Thu Apr 22 08:35:04 2010
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:34:20 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <j2m3c3e3fca1004220418sb1d0e1adm322cb3ec0a9c844c@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2010-04-22 07:18, William Herrin wrote:
> On the other hand, I could swear I've seen a draft where the PC picks
> up random unused addresses in the lower 64 for each new outbound
> connection for anonymity purposes.
That's probably RFC 4941. It's available in pretty much all operating
systems. I don't think there's any IPR issue to be afraid of.
Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
