[125708] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Sparro)
Wed Apr 21 13:54:08 2010
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:53:26 -0400
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4BCEF3B7.8050102@jsbc.cc>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/21/2010 8:46 AM, Jim Burwell wrote:
>
> Despite it doing the job it was intended to do, I've always seen NAT
> as a bit of an ugly hack, with potential to get even uglier with LSN
> and multi-level NAT in the future. I personally welcome a return to a
> NAT-less world with IPv6. :)
>
Don't you get all of the same problems when there is a properly
restrictive SPI firewall at both ends of the connection regardless of
weather NAT is used as well.
