[125705] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Reverse DNS Question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Edward Lewis)
Wed Apr 21 12:01:07 2010
In-Reply-To: <4BCE10A2.3090103@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:00:17 -0400
To: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
At 15:37 -0500 4/20/10, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>To minimize unwarranted hassle, if you will have email senders, spend
>some time looking into the "requirements". I don't think there are any
>RFC or other authoritative standards in the matter.
This is as close as the IETF has come to a document.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06
That document has been expired for 3 years, meaning, no one has
updated it, no one has tried to get a steering committee broad review
(IESG approval), etc.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
Wouldn't it be nice if all of the definitions of equivalence were the same?
