[125682] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jens Link)
Wed Apr 21 06:12:59 2010
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Jens Link <lists@quux.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:12:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20100420145332.58995.qmail@joyce.lan> (John Levine's message of
"20 Apr 2010 14\:53\:32 -0000")
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> writes:
> I'm not saying that NAT is wonderful, but my experience, in which day
> to day stuff all works fine, is utterly different from the doom and
> disaster routinely predicted here.
Ever tried too troubleshoot networks which where using multiple NAT?
Every time I have to I'll have the urge to get really drunk afterwards.
And when ISPs start using NAT for their customers, there will be more
problems leading to more support calls.
Jens
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 |
| http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | ------------------- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
