[125653] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Newton)
Tue Apr 20 18:32:16 2010
From: Mark Newton <newton@internode.com.au>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:01:33 +0930
In-Reply-To: <201004200358.o3K3wDQk071509@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 20/04/2010, at 1:28 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Changing from a public IP address to a private IP address is a big
> change in the conditions of the contract. People do select ISP's
> on the basis of whether they will get a public IP address or a
> private IP address.
Seems to me your objection is based on whether or not the customer
gets a public address vs a private address.
There's no need for NAT pools to be RFC1918. Pretty sure everyone
is going to get a public address of some form... it just won't=20
necessarily be globally unique to them.
As for jurisdictional issues: This particular Australian ISP amended
its T&C document to give us the discretion of providing LSN addresses
about two years ago. Will we need to? Perhaps not. But if we do, the
T&C's are already worked out. Looking ahead in time and forecasting
future risks is one of the things businesses are supposed to do, right?
Regards,
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: newton@internode.com.au (=
W)
Network Engineer Email: newton@atdot.dotat.org (=
H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
