[125650] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Perreault)
Tue Apr 20 18:05:49 2010
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:03:09 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4BCE13E2.2020509@brightok.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 04/20/2010 04:51 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> uPNP at a larger scale? Would require some serious security and
> scalability analysis.
This is the latest proposal. The Security Considerations section needs
some love...
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-softwire-port-control-protocol
Simon
--
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org
