[125608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Smith)
Tue Apr 20 09:33:08 2010
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:02:26 +0930
From: Mark Smith <nanog@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20100420121646.GE15321@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:16:46 +0000
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:58:13PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > > You are charmingly naive about how "the law" actually works in the USA -
> > > that is IMHO.
> >
> > Yes, things vary around the world. You failed to state "In the
> > USA". There is plenty of case law in Australia about companies
> > attempting to arbitarially change terms and conditions to the
> > detriment of the consumer and being made to reverse the changes.
>
>
> this is the North American Network Operators Group.
> Not the Australian Network Operators Group.
>
So when did NA stop being the most litigious society on the planet?
I could see a class action suit over not getting proper big "I" Internet
access like you used to. You guys sue over hot coffee (of both
kinds)!
> > Mark Andrews, ISC
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>
> --bill
>
