[125596] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Tue Apr 20 08:13:40 2010
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:12:16 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <201004200225.o3K2OwVi070153@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:24:57PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <201004200022.o3K0M2Ba007459@aurora.sol.net>, Joe Greco writes:
> > > That'd be easy if you were just starting up an ISP. What do you do with
> > > your existing customer base? If their current service includes a
> > > dynamic public IPv4 address, you can't gracefully take it away, without
> > > likey violating services T&Cs, government telco regulations etc. So
> > > you'll have to go through a formal process of getting agreement with
> > > customers to take them away.
> >
> > I haven't seen any such documents or regulations.
>
> People purchaced the service on the understanding that they would
> get a Internet address. A address behind a NAT is not a Internet
> address, it's a *shared* Internet address which is a very different
> thing.
whats an "Internet" address? and are you sure thats part of
the service offering?
> Mark Andrews, ISC
--bill
