[125584] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Juniper firewalls - SSG or SRX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (seph)
Tue Apr 20 00:40:01 2010
From: seph <seph@directionless.org>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:39:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <95099184-EE87-4191-9EF1-9EE52E6A5738@delong.com> (Owen DeLong's
message of "Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:05:54 -0700")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm with Owen. I have nothing good to say about ScreenOS. In contrast
JunOS has been great.
seph
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> writes:
> Much.. Go SRX over SSG every time. For anything that doesn't have an
> SRX analog, consider the J-series.
>
> SRX/J-Series == JunOS == Good.
> SSG Series == ScreenOS == @)#$*#@)$(*!)(@$!@$
>
> Just my $0.02 having dealt extensively with both environments over the
> years.
>
> Owen
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Negro wrote:
>
>> Has anyone on Nanog had any hands on experience with the lower end of the
>> new SRX series Junipers? We're looking to purchase two new firewalls, and
>> I'm debating going with SSG series or to make the jump to the SRX line. Any
>> input, especially about the learning curve jumping from ScreenOS to JunOS
>> would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.
>>
>> Jeffrey
