[125569] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Greco)
Mon Apr 19 20:12:52 2010
From: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
To: jbates@brightok.net (Jack Bates)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:12:13 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BCCC389.7050604@brightok.net> from "Jack Bates" at Apr 19,
2010 03:56:41 PM
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> > The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
> > so however, something servers cannot do - you are looking at numbers,
> > not operational considerations.
>
> I'll recommend this for competitors.
And what'll you do for your customers when you have no more IPv4
addresses?
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
