[125541] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Mon Apr 19 13:40:07 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <201004191523.o3JFNko9085371@aurora.sol.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:34:30 -0700
To: Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 19, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
>> On 19/04/2010 16:51, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure the acceptance of NAT varies regionally. I think
>>> there's a large ISP in Italy which has been doing NAT since the 90s.
>>
>> to my knowledge, if we're talking about the same organisation, this large
>> ISP is moving away from NAT, or already has done so.
>>
>> Sure, you can NAT eyeballs, but it hurts like hell.
>
> Which hurts more ... NATting eyeballs, or blinding them entirely?
>
> Eventually we'll run out. Then we get to pick.
>
IPv6 is not blinding them entirely.
Owen
