[125539] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mohacsi Janos)
Mon Apr 19 13:27:55 2010
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:26:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
To: Kevin Loch <kloch@kl.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BCC8F01.7060506@kl.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Dear all,
I think there is some discussion and work at IETF to define
solutions.....
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dec-dhcpv6-route-option/
or
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-droms-dhc-dhcpv6-default-router-00.txt
Describe valid engineering reqs to have a drafted at IETF, and you will
find supporters...
Janos Mohacsi
Head of HBONE+ project
Network Engineer, Deputy Director of Network Planning and Projects
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Kevin Loch wrote:
> sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
>
>> *If* the whole IPv6 config can be driven from the same database. For
>> the time being, DHCPv6 cannot deliver a default gateway to customers
>> (and there is a religious faction within the IPv6 community which
>> seem to want to prevent this at all costs).
>
> s/IPv6/IETF/
>
> I don't know of anyone outside of the IETF promoting the insanity
> of a DHCP server not having the option of giving out a gateway address.
>
> - Kevin
>
>
