[125503] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Sun Apr 18 22:52:19 2010
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:52:05 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
In-Reply-To: <4BCBB1A1.1020805@zill.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/18/2010 6:28 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
> Franck Martin wrote:
>> Sure the internet will not die...
>>
>> But by the time we run out of IPv4 to allocate, the IPv6 network will not have completed to dual stack the current IPv4 network. So what will happen?
>>
>
> Reality is that as soon as SSL web servers and SSL-capable web browsers
> have support for name-based virtual hosts, the number of IPv4 addresses
> required will drop. Right now, you need 1 IP address for 1 SSL site;
> SNI spec of SSL gets rid of that.
my load balancer needs 16 ips for every million simultaneous
connections, so does yours.
> --Patrick
>
