[125478] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Senderbase is offbase, need some help
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Levine)
Sat Apr 17 16:29:18 2010
Date: 17 Apr 2010 20:29:05 -0000
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4BC8E3DD.6050806@tiedyenetworks.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I've tried to get the attention of senderbase, which is claiming
>activity from my address space which is in fact either un-routed or
>within dynamic subscriber blocks that have outbound smtp filtering in
>effect. Unfortunately, senderbase refuses to acknowledge the problem in
>their database nor back up their claims with any evidence to the
>contrary other than these ips are listed in their database and that's
>that. I realise this may not strictly be the domain of nanog but I would
>think that quality of services such like senderbase, as measured in both
>false positives as well as their abillity to act on them, would be,
>since many here use and depend on these services. I don't understand how
>or why senderbase would list unrouted address space and further give me
>grief over the reporting of it "Unless the daily volume magnitude shows
>something > 1, I would not be too worried", but accuracy counts and you
>won't have my business unless you can demonstrate some.
>
>Mike-
>
