[125430] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DSL "aggregation".... NO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Truman Boyes)
Thu Apr 15 17:42:43 2010
From: Truman Boyes <truman@suspicious.org>
In-Reply-To: <26CF6BC367161D4BAFC39B6ED6F885F3021901CC@TNEXPRD.hottopic.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:42:31 -0400
To: Bill Lewis <blewis@hottopic.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Bill,
You can do this in JUNOS as well with filter-based-forwarding. The key =
here is that you want to balance traffic out and in on the two uplinks. =
I suspect you will need to src-NAT all the traffic unless you are =
announcing your own network to the two DSL providers. You could also do =
some rudimentary (ie. hack) balancing by having a route for 0/1 and =
128/1 with different next-hops.=20
It's pretty easy to setup balancing on an OpenBSD box with PF as well.=20=
Truman
On 15/04/2010, at 5:05 PM, Bill Lewis wrote:
> Group,
>=20
> Since I'm told that DSL aggregation / mux is currently not possible, =
we
> are looking at doing stream splitting via a technology like FatPipe
> uses. Anyone have this in production usage? Or something similar?
>=20
> Cisco has offered some ways to split via CEF, but most DSL carriers do
> not have this turned on / available.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Thank you,
>=20
> Bill
>=20
> Network dude
>=20
