[125367] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Apr 13 00:15:07 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAACbiG2mmmW2TZ/LtWxQjgb9AQAAAAA=@iname.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:12:55 -0700
To: frnkblk@iname.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org, 'Bill Stewart' <nonobvious@gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I stand corrected on the Mikrotik... Apparently, while not well =
documented, they
do, indeed support IPv6 and their Wiki even includes tunnel =
configuration
information.
Apologies to Mikrotik (and some encouragement to add this to your =
main-line
documentation).
Owen
On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:56 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> We run a 3845 at over 300 Mbps and it's less than 50% CPU....most =
times less
> than 30%. No BGP, just OSPF.
>=20
> Frank
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Stewart [mailto:nonobvious@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:27 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Router for Metro Ethernet
>=20
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dylan Ebner <dylan.ebner@crlmed.com>
> wrote:
>> However, this router also has 2 100mb connections from local lans =
that it
> is also terminiating.
>> For our 100mb metro e connections we use 3845s. The 100 mb service
> terminates into NM-GEs, which have a faster throughput than the hwics.
>=20
> Be careful using 3845s for 100 Mbps connections or above - Cisco rates
> them at 45 Mbps (and 3825 at half of that) but last time I checked
> doesn't make any promises at faster than T3. They're being
> conservative about it, but one thing that really can burn the
> horsepower is traffic shaping, which you need with some MetroE
> carriers.
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> ----
> Thanks; Bill
>=20
> Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still =
experimental so
> far.
> And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.
>=20
>=20
