[125323] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Carrier class email security recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Mon Apr 12 12:22:09 2010
In-Reply-To: <C7E895B2.2D3EB%zaid@zaidali.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:51:57 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I did ask him how many users he was looking to size email for. But a
lot of questions like, and beyond, that - you may or may not want to
answer on nanog.
The man said carrier class .. and you have a set of assumptions. If
you say enterprise you're assuming like 300K..400K mailboxes for the
very largest enterprises. Tops.
That'd be a small to mid sized carrier to spec carrier class for.
I'll end this thread here.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
> I think it is a perfectly reasonable question to ask in NANOG. If someone
> asks how much memory do I need on my router to do BGP, you have to ask the
> fundamental question of how big your routing table will be. I don't see this
> as any different. Its helpful to provide opinions when you are guided by
> some data :)
>
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
