[125243] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 32 bits ASN on Cisco
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Franck Martin)
Sun Apr 11 07:16:16 2010
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: franck@genius.com
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:15:57 +1200 (MAGST)
From: Franck Martin <franck@genius.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Bromirski?= <lukasz@bromirski.net>
In-Reply-To: <5680978.32.1270984335072.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This is the document I quoted in my first email.
ok for 2500, 2600 they are EOL, but still out there..
but Gary says the software is too new to be used on prod, and you say there=
is no problem. So who is right? I see that 12.4(24)T has been released in =
Feb last year. Do people follow the router upgrades closely? What is the co=
mmon sense?
----- Original Message -----
From: "=C5=81ukasz Bromirski" <lukasz@bromirski.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 11 April, 2010 10:31:05 PM
Subject: Re: 32 bits ASN on Cisco
On 2010-04-11 12:15, Franck Martin wrote:
> To come back, to your statement that says it is just supported on
> 7200, means you cannot use a 32bit ASN in production today on any
> hardware?
It doesn't mean anything like that.
As the software is available for some time already, you can
run 32bit ASN in production today, and actually people do that.
Nothing fancy.
For the list of software versions supporting 32 bit ASN please
referer to this document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6599/da=
ta_sheet_C78-521821.html
But yes, you can't run it on 2500 and 2600 as they're for long time
End of Life/Engineering/Support/Everything.
-- "Everything will be okay in the end. | =C5=81ukasz Bromirski
If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
