[125234] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OECD Reports on State of IPv6 Deployment for Policy Makers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Sat Apr 10 17:11:40 2010
X-Envelope-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:11:14 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <i2r9e246b4d1004101336u1c8f3d1dof37bacd7e1f6114b@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/04/2010 21:36, Tim Durack wrote:
> Notify all holders of a currently active AS they have been
> allocated/assigned a /32. No fees. No questions.
>
> To accept the allocation/assignment, it must be advertised within a 24
> month period.
>
> There is no shortage of available /32s in 2000::/3. There is a serious
> shortage of meaningful deployment.
I'm puzzled as to why you might think that this would incentivise
meaningful deployment of ipv6.
Nick
