[125220] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Stewart)
Sat Apr 10 01:25:25 2010
In-Reply-To: <42DD49E7-84F9-479A-A762-81C2791D9895@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 22:25:07 -0700
From: Bill Stewart <nonobvious@gmail.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
One really good thing about spam was that,
before it became a big problem,
all Usenet / Internet discussions had a risk of
devolving into "libertarians vs. socialists" flamewars,
but that got replaced by "*%^&%*& spammers",
and eventually we got that nice little checklist
as a way to quiet even those discussions.
Let's put the "regulators with guns" discussion
back into the pre-spam bin,
and take this back to the "making IPv6 actually work"
topics, of which there are plenty.
(Because after all, the IPv6ian People's Front side is wrong, wrong, wrong! :-)
--
----
Thanks; Bill
Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far.
And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it.
