[125203] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Giagnocavo)
Fri Apr 9 20:29:45 2010
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:29:02 -0400
From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4BBF92F4.1030700@splio.fr>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Benjamin Billon wrote:
>
>>> So basically, the idea is to disconnect China's Internet even more
>>> than what it inflicts to itself?
>> And that is wrong why exactly? ;-)
> Nah, I'm not answering that =D
> Nice try, though.
>>> How fun. What was the FCC/Comcast case about again?
>> It's only port 25, at least here:
>> http://www.okean.com/antispam/iptables/iptables.html
> This is also blocking Sina, Netease, Yahoo.cn and other major Chinese
> ISP/ESP. Am I the only to think this is not very smart?
>
> If you think Chinese DUL would be interesting, please tell me.
>
>
This DID actually bite my company about 3 years ago.
A customer went to China (usually in NYC) and could not send email
through the mail server because they were using POP-before-SMTP instead
of the mail submission port .
Upon return, the customer switched mail service away from us.
--Patrick
