[125186] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Templin)
Fri Apr 9 16:38:50 2010
From: "Jim Templin" <jimtempl@att.net>
To: "'Warren Bailey'" <wbailey@gci.com>,
"'Jeroen van Aart'" <jeroen@mompl.net>, <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <09F712D9B8F7AF40BE523224B2487BA10D8E8194@dtn1mbx01.gci.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:38:33 -0700
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbailey@gci.com]=20
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:31 PM
To: Jeroen van Aart; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
Are we to believe that filtering .cn will filter all Chinese attacks? I =
know that if I was up to no good in China, I'd buy a cheap VSAT =
connection, tld's are probably not a good way to identify bad guys.
My two cents..
//warren
--------------------------
As was pointed out that might have been the point of hijacking IP space =
from outside cn.net. =20
-Jim
