[125158] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT444 vs IPv6 (was RE: legacy /8)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Fri Apr 9 13:02:46 2010
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <002401cad699$7761f810$6625e830$@org>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 07:02:12 -1000
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 7, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
>> Can you provide pointers to these analyses? Any evidence-backed data =
showing how CGN
>> is more expensive would be very helpful.
>=20
> It depends.
...
> That math may or may not make sense for your network..
Right. My question was more along the lines of pointers to written up =
case studies, empirical analyses, actual cost comparisons, etc. between =
CGNs and IPv6 that could be presented (in summarized form) to =
executives, government officials, etc.
Regards,
-drc
