[125133] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Barry)
Fri Apr 9 07:39:33 2010
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:39:19 +0200
From: Martin Barry <marty@supine.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <201004091121.o39BLkLL025885@aurora.sol.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
$quoted_author = "Joe Greco" ;
>
> > Perhaps the true issue is that what you see as broken is perceived as "working
> > as intended" by much of the community and membership?
>
> That's a great point. Would you agree, then, that much of the community
> and membership implicitly sees little value in IPv6?
Is that orthogonal to Owen's statement?
> You can claim that's a bit of a stretch, but quite frankly, the RIR
> policies, the sketchy support by providers, the lack of v6 support in
> much common gear, and so many other things seem to be all conspiring
> against v6 adoption. I need only point to v6 adoption rates to support
> that statement.
Which rates would those be?
http://www.ipv6actnow.org/info/statistics/
IPv6 has had a slow start but it's certainly picking up.
cheers
Marty
