[125116] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP hijack from 23724 -> 4134 China?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (goemon@anime.net)
Thu Apr 8 23:16:07 2010
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: goemon@anime.net
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <1C1064B0-8CCC-4141-8AB3-4A2F29D95716@tcb.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Danny McPherson wrote:
> FWIW, this is a lot like putting a bandaid on a headache - it's not going
> to do much good in reality, and likely cause more harm than good in properly
> secured networks - but it might make some folks feel a little better.
behavior modification. chinanet doesn't listen to complaints from victims.
perhaps they'll listen to complaints from customers when they can't reach
anyone anymore.
this is after all how spam RBLs work. providers don't care one whit about
everyone who gets spammed, but they care if their customers walk because
they can't reach anyone.
-Dan
