[125088] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Payne)
Thu Apr 8 18:06:44 2010
From: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E2D995F-80BB-46E3-8B8F-E155C83066FF@delong.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 18:05:52 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
>>
>>> *I* am personally convinced that IPv6 is great, but on the other
>>> hand,
>>> I do not see so much value in v6 that I am prepared to compel the
>>> budgeting for ARIN v6 fees, especially since someone from ARIN just
>>> described all the ways in which they fritter away money.
>>
>> Well, if you join ARIN you could propose policy to get you IPv6
>> space for free, so you can continue to not support the registration
>> services you implicitly rely on.
>> Just sayin'.
>
> Clarification required here:
>
> You do not have to join ARIN to propose policy.
>
> Fees are not policy.
>
> You do not have to join ARIN to propose changes to fees through the
> ACSP.
>
> You do have to join ARIN to vote in AC and BoT elections.
Thanks Owen.. I was taking member driven literally :)
