[125081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Apr 8 17:40:11 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFD4F7-4123-43A4-A637-7B570274D5AF@sackheads.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:38:15 -0700
To: John Payne <john@sackheads.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, Joe Greco <jgreco@ns.sol.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>=20
>> *I* am personally convinced that IPv6 is great, but on the other =
hand,
>> I do not see so much value in v6 that I am prepared to compel the=20
>> budgeting for ARIN v6 fees, especially since someone from ARIN just
>> described all the ways in which they fritter away money.
>=20
> Well, if you join ARIN you could propose policy to get you IPv6 space =
for free, so you can continue to not support the registration services =
you implicitly rely on.
> Just sayin'.
Clarification required here:
You do not have to join ARIN to propose policy.
Fees are not policy.
You do not have to join ARIN to propose changes to fees through the =
ACSP.
You do have to join ARIN to vote in AC and BoT elections.
Owen
