[124729] in North American Network Operators' Group
UETS/EFR (was Re: what about 48 bits?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Duck)
Sun Apr 4 11:44:33 2010
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 08:43:25 -0700
From: "William Duck" <nanog@qualitymail.com>
To: <skandor@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: nanog@qualitymail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
http://www.lmdata.es/uets.htm
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: what about 48 bits?
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:53:54 -0300
From: A.B. Jr. <skandor@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Hi,
Lots of traffic recently about 64 bits being too short or too long.
What about mac addresses? Aren't they close to exhaustion? Should be. Or it
is assumed that mac addresses are being widely reused throughout the world?
All those low cost switches and wifi adapters DO use unique mac addresses?
_____________________________________________________________
Get your own *free* email address like this one from www.OwnEmail.com
