[124718] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Sun Apr 4 10:48:12 2010
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:45:44 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <x2y113c8ba81004040300o2c2948d9s4054012fab570527@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 4/4/2010 05:00, IPv3.com wrote:
> Based on these ASCII notes...(c. 1995 cave paintings)...
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1775.txt
>
> Was a 1956 Video Phone User - "On the Internet" ?
> http://www.porticus.org/bell/telephones-picturephone.html
>
> Is a 2010 HDTV (ATSC DLNA) viewer - "On the Internet" ?
>
> Note for IPv6 archeologists...Mobile Digital TV went with IPv4+Shim
> http://www.atsc.org
>
> Funding of the so-called Eco-System (aka Idle Rich Society) also
> appears to define "The Internet" in some circles. It appears 100+
> people live off of Internet Fees for doing largely nothing. They of
> course travel to explain why that structure is essential. Is it ?
Are you sure you are on the right platform--sounds more like I would
expect to hear in Amherst or Sproul hall.
Or did you just forget to mention your point?
To answer the question in the Subject: (the last time anything made
sense to me in that message):
No. It was an experiment in the PANS branch of POTS (PSTN to some people).
--
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
