[124331] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On The
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Conrad)
Tue Mar 30 20:16:30 2010
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <88ac5c711003301705i4a985d1ey3915b0bcdf091279@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:15:47 -1000
To: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Well, actually, ICANN was in Geneva specifically for the meeting, but we =
weren't allowed into the room. Quite annoying, actually.
Regards,
-drc
On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> There were a few representatives of the Internet community at the
> meeting. All five RIRs were represented, as was ISOC. The notable
> absence was ICANN. Of course, this sample is by no means
> representative of the entire community, but it's more than "None."
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Martin Hannigan
> <martin@theicelandguy.com> wrote:
>> None.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 3/11/10, Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote:
>>> What NANOG contributors, if any, are invited by a government, to =
join
>>> their national delegation to the initial meeting of the ITU's IPv6
>>> Group in Geneva next week?
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile device
>>=20
>> Martin Hannigan =
martin@theicelandguy.com
>> p: +16178216079
>> Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and =
Occupants
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
