[12416] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

NANOG-PHYSICS (was Re: ATM (was Re: too many routes))

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John A. Tamplin)
Mon Sep 15 17:20:11 1997

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 16:14:00 -0500 (CDT)
From: "John A. Tamplin" <jat@traveller.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199709152033.NAA05649@bif.mainstreet.net>

Did I make a mistake and signup for nanog-physics instead of nanog?  While
we are at it, why don't we just come up with wave equations for the 
entire Internet?

On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Mark Kent wrote:

> Those of you who want the Internet described in terms of elementary
> particles might also be interested in a bit of detail left off
> by Rob Barron:
> 
>   A ping pong ball is 37.2mm to 38.2mm in diameter and 
>   weighs 2.40 to 2.53 grams.
> 
> So a 40mm inside diameter seems to be called for.
> 
> -mark
> 

John Tamplin					Traveller Information Services
jat@Traveller.COM				2104 West Ferry Way
205/883-4233x7007				Huntsville, AL 35801


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post