[124101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2009 IPv4 Address Use Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Tue Mar 23 17:50:05 2010
In-Reply-To: <4BA93611.3030708@mompl.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:49:30 -0700
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net> wrote:
> Interesting statistics.
>
> It'd be interesting to know what % of newly assigned addresses are used for
> fraudulent and illegal purposes such as spam and scamming (how soon and how
> frequently will the newly assigned 1.1.1.0/8 block start appearing in block
> lists and spam reports?).
it's not clear that 1.1.1.0/24 is actually assigned to anyone,
RIPE/APNIC were just using for some experiments. Did you actually mean
1.0.0.0/8?
