[124082] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP4 Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Newton)
Tue Mar 23 01:28:08 2010
From: Mark Newton <newton@internode.com.au>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:57:27 +1030
In-Reply-To: <330AC06A-2719-4159-A7C9-EB13FFB2B13B@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>=20
> With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less expens=
ive. As a result, I suspect there will be more IPv6 small multihomers.
> That's generally a good thing.
Puzzled: How does the IPv6 routing table get smaller?
There's currently social pressure against deaggregation, but given time
why do you think the same drivers that lead to v4 deaggregation won't also
lead to v6 deaggregation?
(small multihomers means more discontiguous blocks of PI space too, right?)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: newton@internode.com.au (=
W)
Network Engineer Email: newton@atdot.dotat.org (=
H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
