[124003] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NSP-SEC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Mar 19 11:34:46 2010
To: Adam Stasiniewicz <adam@adamstas.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:08:55 CDT."
<f38baa0e211cd438637999417b1ae7c6@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:33:38 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1269012818_3864P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:08:55 CDT, Adam Stasiniewicz said:
> IMHO, I think you have it backwards. I see strategic discussions (like
> new crypto algorithms, technologies, initiatives, etc) should be open to
> public debate, review, and scrutiny. But operational/tactical discussions
> (like new malware, software exploits, virus infected hosts, botnets, etc)
> don't need public review.
Reducto ad absurdum: The police don't usually phone ahead to a suspect and say
"We're planning to stop by around 4PM and execute a search warrant, so please
don't destroy any evidence before then, ktxbai"
--==_Exmh_1269012818_3864P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFLo5lScC3lWbTT17ARAsVaAKDDml2wbbXfy5qe4TCQIg/oUCLN8gCg43j9
L4bqdYb/58BSthRGVrqK1gw=
=cO2B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1269012818_3864P--
