[123994] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Fri Mar 19 09:57:32 2010
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:56:36 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: William Pitcock <nenolod@systeminplace.net>
In-Reply-To: <1269006269.1220.135.camel@petrie>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 08:44:29AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
> > An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
> > trusted communities without leaks.
>
> Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
> thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
> have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
> bullshit.
I thnk I'd settle for operators with Integrity. those who do what
they say.
--bill
