|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:48:52 -0600 From: Tom Ammon <tom.ammon@utah.edu> To: Jaren Angerbauer <jarenangerbauer@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4c6b8c911003180922j426f6e94g37eb772210a249f8@mail.gmail.com> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org RFC1918 is a good place to start ;) On 3/18/2010 10:22 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote: > Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this. I acknowledge I'm > playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump > to the conclusion that this range was private. I made that assumption > originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured > since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S > > It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any > document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about > this, and/or provide evidence to my client? > > Thanks, > > Jaren > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Ammon Network Engineer Office: 801.587.0976 Mobile: 801.674.9273 Center for High Performance Computing University of Utah http://www.chpc.utah.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |