[123948] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jaren Angerbauer)
Thu Mar 18 12:24:03 2010
In-Reply-To: <FD2994E6-4B7C-4BB1-AFF8-9A154FD9D4B7@delong.com>
From: Jaren Angerbauer <jarenangerbauer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:22:40 -0600
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this. I acknowledge I'm
playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump
to the conclusion that this range was private. I made that assumption
originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured
since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S
It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any
document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about
this, and/or provide evidence to my client?
Thanks,
Jaren
