|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:57:32 -0400 From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> To: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott@oicr.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <DC204E6D75668940B66017BBFA7155728EF05CDD6D@EXCHANGE01.ad.oicr.on.ca> Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org Nice, I've used mountains (Denali, Everest, Olympus, etc) in the past to name systems. Used profanity for awhile to name machines, there's really quite a bit of it, and every language has it's own set, giving a large pool to choose from. Sadly, when outages occurred, it was somewhat difficult to determine which machines were down, and this was discarded. Andrew Greg Whynott wrote: > We use confidence inspiring names here for our devices, shakey, broken, jitter, crusty.... > > G >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |