[123737] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Network Naming Conventions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Yardley)
Sun Mar 14 18:34:44 2010
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:34:03 -0700
From: William Yardley <nanog@veggiechinese.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <C0A98BB6DAFAAB46A78BBA2C51B98F3E01079C91@nexus.nexicomgroup.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:47:28AM -0500, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Going forward, I'd like to examine a better method to identify the
> devices.... does anyone have published standards on what they use or
> that of other networks and maybe even why they chose those methods?
Looked through the thread figuring someone else would have mentioned
this one, but (unless I missed it), they didn't. So sorry if you've seen
this already, but I think this presentation is a really good take on the
subject.
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog31/abstracts.php?pt=NjExJm5hbm9nMzE=&nm=nanog31
