[123568] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [Fwd: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] RIPE NCC Position On
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Mar 11 05:09:19 2010
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:08:55 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100227062038.38AD01CC0E@ptavv.es.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I'm sorry, but some people are spending too much time denying
> history. IPv6 has been largely ready for YEARS. Less than five years ago
> a lot of engineers were declaring IPv6 dead and telling people that
> double and triple NAT was the way of the future. It's only been over the
> past two years that a clear majority of the networks seemed to agree
> that IPv6 was the way out of the mess. (I know some are still in
> denial.)
http://www.hactrn.net/sra/vorlons
a decade old, but still rings true
randy
