[123548] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wireless Ethernet bridge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Brown/Clack/ESD)
Wed Mar 10 17:31:45 2010
In-Reply-To: <1b5c1c151003101423l4b35c2fck10eada542442603f@mail.gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Scott Brown/Clack/ESD <SBrown@clackesd.k12.or.us>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:31:06 -0800
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
The Dragonwave would be my first choice too, but they are not in the 5.8GHz
band.
The Motorola PTP-600 has a 2000 byte MTU, but doesn't do multimode handoff.
What radio to get will come down to what you are willing to give up -- if
you are willing to drop the 5.8Ghz band and go with 11Ghz then the
Dragonwave is for you -- the new Horizon Quantum is amazing (and pretty
inexpensive when I priced it out)
Bridgewave isn't bad either - you can get to 1.25Gbps with some fiber
handoff.
Scott
Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com> wrote on 03/10/2010 02:23:33 PM:
> From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon@gmail.com>
> To: Stefano Gridelli <sgridelli@gmail.com>
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Date: 03/10/2010 02:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Wireless Ethernet bridge
>
> Check out DragonWave:
>
> http://www.dragonwaveinc.com/
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Stefano Gridelli
<sgridelli@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need a wireless bridge solution that allows to pass jumbo frames over
a
> > distance of 3 miles, using the 5.8 GHz band. The original solution was
a
> > Proxim Tsunami GX 200, but unfortunately it doesn't go beyond an MTU of
> > 1536
> > bytes: we need at least 1544 bytes, ideally between 4470 and 9212 bytes
> > MTU. The handoff should be MM fiber, the desired throughput 200 Mbps.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> >
