[12353] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: not rewriting next-hop, pointing default, ...s
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@ISI.EDU)
Fri Sep 12 16:12:16 1997
From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
To: nathan@netrail.net (Nathan Stratton)
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: amb@xara.net, freedman@netaxs.com, bilse@eu.net, nshen@mci.net,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970912153148.11388C-100000@netrail.net> from "Nathan Stratton" at Sep 12, 97 03:33:51 pm
> If they buy transit, or do not buy transit from UUNet makes no difference.
> You don't see a problem with pointing default at UUNet or any other
> provider? This trace was to a network that did not exist, so it should not
> have been sent to UUNet.
>
> Nathan Stratton President, CTO, NetRail,Inc.
Hum. network that did not exist.....
Interesting concept.
can you ensure that the prefix was
not seen inside the UUnet AS bound?
--bill
