[123524] in North American Network Operators' Group
Res: CRS-3 x T1600
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (GIULIANO (UOL))
Wed Mar 10 11:45:10 2010
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:44:33 -0300
From: "GIULIANO (UOL)" <giulianocm@uol.com.br>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4B97CBDF.6070605@uol.com.br>
Reply-To: giulianocm@uol.com.br
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to "new" CRS-3.
T1600 - 250 Gbps full duplex / slot
CRS-3 - 120 Gbps full duplex / slot
CISCO is MUCH better using marketing than JUNIPER : )
Both companies looks like want to reach 4 Tbps capacity with their CORE
Routers.
I think JUNIPER have been tested 100 Gbps ethernet line card for so long.
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2009/pr_2009_06_08-09_00.html
JUNIPER has talked about 5 Watts/Gigabit.
CISCO said something about 3 Watts/Gigabit.
Big and good fight.
Best for all of us.
